How Much Do Telescopes Weigh, A Comparative Guide?

man looking with binoculars at dusk sky

As I age, my back was telling me about this concept of weight of different telescopes and related sizes. This is my conclusion of data, I hope you benefit from knowing How Much Telescopes Weigh

The average weight per millimeter of telescope aperture is: 0.199 lbs (0.090 kg). So, on average, a 100mm telescope weighs 19.9lbs (9.0kg). The weight typically includes the factory telescope mount if provided.

Aperture (mm)
of Aperture
Refractor76.67 mm13.91 lb (6.3kg)0.163 lb (.073kg)7.92$185
Reflector124.97 mm20.74 lb (9.41kg)0.166 lb (.075kg)6.38$160
Cassegrain163.16 mm41.89 lb (19kg)0.230 lb (.105kg)11.41$950
Dobsonian215.93 mm54.11 lb (24.54kg)0.241 lb (.109kg)5.89$490
APO Refractor100.00 mm18.64 lb (8.45kg)0.193 lb (.088kg)7.40$1,690
Overall Avg136.14 mm29.86 lb (13.54kg)0.199 lb (.090kg)7.80$475

If you are buying something outside the average…in other words, you are a rebel. You want a telescope, perhaps a little different; let’s get “weigh” deeper on this subject below! (Promise no more lousy humor)

Telescope Weight Comparative Table & Chart


Let’s start with the most common style. You can see compared to reflector style that the weight is higher per aperture size. This is mainly a result of the extra glass or lenses involved in focusing the light.

Learn more about a refractor telescope here.

Refractor Table

ManufacturerModelAperture (mm)Weight
in lbs
Weight (lbs)
per mm
CelestronTravel Scope 50502.700.05401.227.2
Meade209001 502.870.05741.3012.0
CelestronTravel Scope 70704.200.06001.905.7
Celestron Power Seeker 70EQ7013.900.19866.3010.0
CelestronTravel Scope 80804.500.05632.045.0
Gysker80mm AZ804008015.500.19387.035.0
Gysker600X90 AZ9017.000.18897.716.7
CelestronAstroMaster 90EQ9027.000.300012.2411.0
Orion9024 AstroView909029.500.327813.3810.1
Orion9005 AstroView 120ST12036.300.302516.465.0

The chart gives an excellent visual reference to size and weight along with the f/ratio. For example, the Meade and Celestron 127 EQ, the Meade is 6.5lb (3kg) heavier…

refractor chart


So, the reflector style scope, This telescope is lighter because there is less glass involved. The reflector telescope, also called a “Newtonian” after Isaac Newton, uses one big mirror that directs light at another second mirror.

Some claim the downfall of this design is you need bigger apertures to receive the same amount of light. Learn more about reflector scopes here.

Reflector Table

ManufacturerModelAperure (mm)Weight lbsWeight (lbs) per mmWeight KgF/ratio
OrionSky Scanner 1001006.20.06202.814.0
CelestronAstroMaster 114EQ11417.00.14917.718.7
CelestronPower Seeker 114EQ11418.90.16588.578.0
Orion10015 Star Blast114.313.00.11375.904.0
OrionOrion Starblast ii 4.5114.320.70.18119.393.9
CelestronPowerSeeker 127EQ12721.40.16839.708.0
Meade216005 Polaris 127EQ12727.90.219712.657.9
CelestronAstroMaster 130EQ13017.00.13087.718.7
CelestronNexStar 130SLT13018.00.13858.165.0
OrionSpaceProbe 130ST13024.20.186210.985.0
Meade216006 Polaris 130EQ13026.80.206212.155.0
CelestronAdvanced VX Series 6"15039.5.263317.905.0
Orion10016 StarBlast 615023.60.157310.705.0

You can see quickly by looking at this chart how the size aperture has a fairly large gap over the other specs like weight and f/ratio. It would have been cool to add prices too, but they change too much overtime.

reflector chart


In simplistic terms, a cassegrain, also known as a compound telescope, is a combination of refractor and reflector styles. To learn more about a cassegrain, click here.

I personally look at it as a compound bow. Light enters (like a refractor) and is directed to a mirror that reflects it back to a 2nd mirror (like a reflector), which then sends the light through the center hole of the mirror toward your eyepiece.

How is it like a compound bow? Because one lens or mirror compounds on the next mirror. (replace mirror with the word pully, it may help see the weird way I think?)

Cassegrain Table

ManufacturerModelAperure (mm)Weight
Weight (lbs)
per mm
Orion10022 StarMax 90906.50.07222.9513.9
Meade205004 ETX909018.90.21008.5713.8
Meade205005 ETX12512525.70.205611.6615.0
CelestronNexstar 5SE12527.60.220812.5210.0
CelestronNexstar 6SE15030.00.200013.6110.0
Meade228004 LX6520339.50.194617.9110.0
CelestronNexstar 8SE203.233.00.162414.9710.0
Celestron Advance VX8203.280.00.393736.2810.0
CelestronCGX1100 HD279115.80.415152.5210.0

If you notice on the graph that the F/ratio is hard to read, but you can make out that the F/ratio is 10 or higher on compound scopes. The highest in the chart is the Meade ETX125 at 15 F/ratio.

This higher F ratio allows for greater magnification abilities, and therefore great for planet viewing.

cassegrain chart


Affectionately called a light bucket by adoring Dob owners, these guys are large reflector style telescopes that have bases instead of mounts. The larger aperture can often be a truss and tube design. Learn More about Dobsonian telescopes here.

Astronomers often make unique platforms known as “wedges” that can be motorized with computer controls or just a motor for tracking celestial objects. These are available from manufacturers as well. Dob’s are often the style telescope that are homemade too.

Dobsonian Table

ManufacturerModelAperture (mm)Weight
Weight (lbs)
per mm
OrionSkyQuest XT6152.420.10.13199.128.0
SkyWatcher11810 GoTo25472.00.283532.654.7

It is hard to tell what the F/ratio is on the chart below, but it starts at 8 f/ratio for the 6” SkyQuest. And ends with 5 f/ratio for the Skywatchers. Dob’s are often used for a wide field of view, and a low F/ratio is desired.

dobsonian chart

APO Refractor

What is the difference between an APO refractor and a standard refractor? The first thing noticeable is the price. The same size aperture in an APO runs about 10X more than our normal refractor scope. Yep, a nice $200 refractor would be about $2000 (without the mount, by the way).

Why is that? Well, the quality of lenses and the amount of lenses used in manufacturing is why. They use multiple lenses to practically remove aberration and distortions. Many astrophotographers desire APO’s.

APO Refractor Table

ManufacturerModelAperure (mm)Weight
Weight (lbs)
per mm
Vixen2617 ED80S8013.00.16255.907.5
SkyWatcherProEd Doublet APO8022.00.27509.987.5
SkyWatcherProEd 100 Doublet10029.00.290013.159.0
Orion10031 EON 110 ED11011.50.10455.226.0
Meade6000 130 APO Trplet13017.70.13628.037.0

You will notice the weight of an APO is heavier than a typical refractor on the graph too. It is evidence of the extra glass weight involved.

Also, all the APO’s do not come with mounts, so the mount’s weight would be extra poundage.

APO chart

Not in the Table? How To Calculate Your Scope’s Weight

OK, if you own it, you most likely know, but I am talking about a telescope you intend on purchasing, and it is not in the tables above.

This is where you would take the average of the style scope you’re intending and multiply it by your aperture to get a nice ballpark estimate.

(Average Wt per mm) X (Aperture size in mm)

How The Weight was Calculated for The Table

I took the top-selling sizes in their class and found the manufacturer’s weights, less packaging. Almost all mounts that came with the scope were included in the weight calculations.

Further, tabletop-style scopes were definitely inclusive as the unit’s complete weight since the mount is part of the telescope.

Then, we found the average of each style telescope and compiled it across all styles for an overall average. Pretty straightforward, just time-consuming.

Why Does The Telescope Weight Even Matter?

This is a good question, but the question has come up several times. It mostly breaks down into 3 categories of reasons…

  • Parents and grandparents are searching for gift ideas for younger astronomers.
  • Hikers and campers are searching for dark skies.
  • Older fellows like myself, making sure I don’t hurt my back trying to set up quickly on a crisp, clear night.

It may seem rhetorical. However, with the above three instances, it can make a bit more sense. Next, we will dig a little deeper into finding the best telescope based on weight and use.

The Best Lightest Telescopes For Hiking or Camping

First, if you are hiking, you want a telescope that is ready to point and view. This leaves refractor and APO refractor-style telescopes.

Second, anything under 70mm in aperture size is not really worth the effort in lugging around. See more about Sizing a telescope in this article.

Third, if we are traveling with the telescope, it needs to be easy to pack up and set up.

OK, We narrowed down the field and will pick the best ones left to choose from all of the above. The Winner is:

Celestron Travel Scope 80

travel scope at camp site

This scope only weighs 4.5lbs (2.04kg). It is a short tube and easy to pack and go. It comes with a backpack bag and cell phone adapter, 10mm and 20 mm eyepieces, plus a Barlow lens.

The telescope is considered a quick scope, meaning it has a F/ratio of 5, which will make planets a little harder to view. However, the rest of space is easier to see. The quality of your viewing can be improved in the future by upgrading your eyepieces and Barlow lens if desired.

To learn more about the F/Ratio, check out this article.

The Best Telescopes for Your Own Backyard Astronomy

This is where it comes down to thinking of a child setting up themselves, or someone with a bad back having to set up.

With a child telescope, it mostly can be narrowed down by age and ability. See more about the best telescopes by age group to purchase in this article.

A quick summary is…a reflector telescope is lighter based per aperture size.  So if it is a telescope that has to be set up each time, it may be best to lean toward the reflector style for adults that may not be able to lift and twist. If you take the time to set up a backyard observatory, then any size goes.

Are There Ways To Make the Telescope Lighter?

Not really. Manufacturers engineer the material to be reduced as much as possible and still perform as needed.

The only thing that can be done is to make a speedy setup by adding dovetail quick attach clamping mechanisms, so setup time is reduced. Thus, intently making smaller packages to carry, so to speak.

Check out what dovetails are available by seeing what is currently available on Amazon quick.

I have always been guilty of a “lazy-man’s-load”…where you work harder trying to not make more trips.

What Telescope Accessories Make it Heavier?

Once you have your telescope, extra weight can only come from adding better lenses and spotter scopes. This isn’t much weight at all and doesn’t really count as weight. Less than a pound, perhaps?

Many accessories do not have to be calibrated. They can be carried separately from the scope, so their weight doesn’t matter either.

You can, however, add weight by upgrading your mount. An Alt-Az mount that came with your scope enhanced up to a computerized equatorial mount; not that you need this much of an upgrade. However, a fully assembled equatorial mount can weigh over 100 pounds.

As an example, the Celestron CGX-L Computerized Equatorial Mount and Tripod weighs a whopping 121 lbs (54kg). It is stated to hold up to 75 lb (34kg) payload (which means, big scope). Check out what it looks like at

Wrap up

You probably know by now how and when you plan to use your telescope. As mentioned throughout the article, but I will wrap it up here. Traveling, hiking or camping; getting a good travel or refractor is your best bet. Back yard viewing, your open to your ability to lift and carry. Making your own backyard observatory, it is always set up, so your only limited to your imagination (or zoning). Best wishes and clear skies!


Hi, I'm Will! I received my first telescope at 12 and, despite initial setbacks, reignited my passion for astronomy recently. With a background in engineering and business, I started this blog as a real-world guide to navigating the cosmos, sharing personal insights and practical tips to help you enjoy stargazing without the frustration. Join me in exploring the universe!

These may help...